##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The present study focuses on the analysis of flow characteristics inside a 180° bent channel by adopting two distinct RANS model namely, Realizable k-? and Reynolds Stress Model (RSM). The computation results, obtained from both case study have been validated against experimental data at different cross-sections throughout the bend region and downstream tangent for velocity distribution. The anisotropic behavior of turbulent flow was illustrated for both case study inside the bend region and it has been established that after 3° the flow gradually became more intense at the outer core. Pressure coefficient throughout the u-channel was depicted for both turbulence model and a characteristic feature has been obtained. Due to centrifugal force and high inlet Reynolds number, a pair of counter-rotating Dean vortices were constructed at different stations inside the bend region. From both demonstrations, it was revealed that, Realizable k-? model provided relatively better approximation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. Chen, Z. G. Zhang. Numerical simulation of turbulent driven secondary flow in a 90° bend pipe, Advanced Materials Research, vols. 765-767, 2013, pp. 514-519.
     Google Scholar
  2. J. Kim, M. Yadav, S. Kim. Characteristics of secondary flow induced by 90-degree elbow in turbulent pipe flow, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 8, issue 2, November 2014, pp. 229-239.
     Google Scholar
  3. P. Dutta, N. Nandi. Effect of Reynolds Number and curvature ratio on single phase turbulent flow in pipe bends, Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 19, No. 1, 2015, pp. 5-16.
     Google Scholar
  4. Y. Wang, Q. Dong, P. Wang. Numerical investigation on fluid flow in a 90-degree curved pipe with large curvature ratio, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID- 548262.
     Google Scholar
  5. Muhammad Ahsan. Numerical analysis of friction factor for a fully developed turbulent flow using k-ε turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment, Beni - Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, issue 4, December 2014, pp. 269-277.
     Google Scholar
  6. R. R. Chowdhury, S. Biswas, Md. M. Alam, A. K. M. Sadrul Islam. Turbulent flow analysis on bend and downstream of the bend for different curvature ratio, AIP Conference Proceedings 1754, 040020, July 2016.
     Google Scholar
  7. P. Dutta, N. Nandi. Effect of bend curvature on velocity & pressure distribution from straight to a 90° pipe bend - a numerical study, REST Journal on Emerging trends in Modelling and Manufacturing, vol. 2, issue 4, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  8. B. Feng, S. Wang, S. Li, X. Yang, S. Jiang. Experimental and numerical study on pressure distribution of 90° elbow for flow measurement, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2014, Article ID-964585.
     Google Scholar
  9. P. Dutta, S. K. Saha, N. Nandi, N. Pal. Numerical study on flow separation in 90° pipe bend under high Reynolds number by k-ε modelling, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 19, issue 2, 2016, pp. 904-910.
     Google Scholar
  10. M. K. Rathore, D.S. Mondloe, S. Upadhyay. Computational investigation of fluid flow 90° bend pipe using finite volume approach, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4 Issue: 06, June 2017, pp. 1828-1833.
     Google Scholar
  11. K. Sudo, M. Sumida, H. Hibara. Experimental investigation on turbulent flow in a circular-sectioned 90-degree bend, Experiments in Fluids, vol. 25, issue 1, June 1998, pp. 42- 49.
     Google Scholar
  12. S. Vijiapurapu, J. Cui. Performance of turbulence models for flows through rough pipes, Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 34, issue 6, June 2010, pp. 1458-1466.
     Google Scholar
  13. S. K. Saha, N. Nandi. Change in flow separation and velocity distribution due to effect of guide vane installed in a 90° pipe bend, Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 21, issue 2, 2017, pp. 353-361.
     Google Scholar
  14. P. Dutta, N. Nandi. Study on pressure drop characteristics of single phase turbulent flow in pipe bend for high Reynolds number, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 10, No. 5, March 2015, pp. 2221-2226.
     Google Scholar
  15. Md. S. Hossain, Md. I. Hossain, S. Pramanik, J. U. Ahamed. Analyzing the turbulent flow characteristics by utilizing k–ϵ turbulence model, European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, vol. 2, issue 11, 2017, pp. 28-34.
     Google Scholar
  16. J. Azzola, J.A.C. Humphrey. Developing turbulent flow in a 180° curved pipe and its downstream tangent, Report No. LBL-17681. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, 1984.
     Google Scholar
  17. H. Sugiyama, D. Hitomi. Numerical analysis of developing turbulent flow in a 180° bend tube by an algebraic Reynolds stress model, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vo. 47, issue 12, April 2005, pp. 1431–1449.
     Google Scholar
  18. X. Guan, Ted B. Martonen. Simulations of flow in curved tubes, Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 26, issue 6, June 2007, pp. 485-504.
     Google Scholar
  19. H. G. Cuming. The secondary flow in curved pipes, Aeronautical Research council, Reports and Memoranda, No. 2880, February 1952.
     Google Scholar
  20. M. Rowe. Measurements and computations flow in pipe bends. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 43, issue 4, October 1970, pp. 771–783.
     Google Scholar
  21. J. Azzola, J. A. C. Humphrey, H. Iacovides, B. E. Launder. Developing turbulent flow in a u-bend of circular cross-section: measurement and computation. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Fluid Engineering, vol. 108, issue 2, June 1986, pp. 214–221.
     Google Scholar
  22. H. Sugiyama, T. Tanaka, H. Mukai. Numerical analysis of turbulent flow separation in a rectangular duct with a sharp 180-degree turn by algebraic Reynolds stress model, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 56, issue 12, April 2007, pp. 2207-2228.
     Google Scholar
  23. Alexandre Joel Chorin. Numerical solution of Navier-stokes equations, Mathematics of Computation, vol. 22, October 1968, pp. 745 -762.
     Google Scholar
  24. M. Ariff, S. M. Salim, S. C. Cheah. Wall Y+ approach for dealing with turbulent flow over a surface mounted cube: part 1 - low Reynolds number, Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, December 2009.
     Google Scholar
  25. S. V. Patankar, D.B. Spalding. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 15, issue 10, October 1972, pp. 1787-1806.
     Google Scholar
  26. T. H. Shih, W.W. Liou, A. Shabbir, Z. Yang, J. Zhu. A New Eddy-Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows - Model Development and Validation. Computers & Fluids, vol. 24, issue 3, March 1995, pp. 227-238.
     Google Scholar
  27. M. M. Gibson, B. E. Launder. Ground Effects on Pressure Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 86, issue 3, June 1978, pages 491–511.
     Google Scholar
  28. B. E. Launder. Second-Moment Closure: Present… and Future? International Journal of Heat Fluid Flow, Vol. 10, issue 4, December 1989, pp. 282–300.
     Google Scholar
  29. B. E. Launder, G. J. Reece, W. Rodi. Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 68, issue 3, April 1975, pp. 537–566.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)