Vibration Analysis in Turbomachines Using Machine Learning Techniques



Abstract Views
3274

Downloads
2672

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Feb 5, 2019
Published Feb 17, 2019
10.24018/ejeng.2019.4.2.1128

Abstract viewed = 3274 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study proposes a method for diagnosing faults in turbomachines using machine learning techniques. In this study, a support vector machine-SVM algorithm is proposed for fault diagnosis of rotor rotation imbalance. Recently, support vector machines (SVMs) have become one of the most popular classification methods in vibration analysis technology. Axis unbalance defect is classified using support vector machines. The experimental data is derived from the turbomachine model of the rigid-shaft rotor and the flexible bearings, and the experimental setup for vibration analysis. Several situations of unbalance defects have been successfully detected.

Keywords: Machine Learning; Fault Diagnosis Vibration Analysis Fault Classification

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. D. E. Bently; C. T. Hatch, and B. Grissom. “Fundamentals of Rotating Machinery Diagnostics”. Minden, Nev.: Bently Pressurized Bearing Press, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  2. B. Luo, H. Wang, H. Liu, B. Li, F. Peng. “Early Fault Detection of Machine Tools Based on Deep Learning and Dynamic Identification. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, V. 66, Issue 1, p.509-518, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  3. B. Ayhan, M. Y. Chow and M. H. Song, “Multiple Discriminant Analysis and Neural Network-Based Monolith and Partition Fault-Detection Schemes for Broken Rotor Bar in Induction Motors”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronic, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 1298-1308, August 2006.
     Google Scholar
  4. I. Aydin, M. Karakose and E. Akin. “Artificial immune based support vector machine algorithm for fault diagnosis of induction motors”. 2007 International Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics, Sep. 2007.
     Google Scholar
  5. R. Razavi-Far, M. Kinnaert. ‘Incremental design of a decision system for residual evaluation: a wind turbine application.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, V.45, Issue 20, pp. 342-348, Jan. 2012.
     Google Scholar
  6. R. Razavi-Far, M. Saif, V. Palade and E. Zio. “Adaptive incremental ensemble of extreme learning machines for fault diagnosis in induction motor.”. 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), July 2017.
     Google Scholar
  7. I. Martin-Diaz, D. Morinigo-Sotelo, O. Duque-Perez and. T.J. Romero-Troncoso. ‘‘An experimental comparative evaluation of machine learning techniques for motor fault diagnosis under various operating conditions.’’ IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 54, NO. 3, May-June 2018.
     Google Scholar
  8. P.H.F. Souza, N. Nascimento, P.P.R. Filho and. C.M.S. Medeiros. ‘‘Detection and classification of faults in induction generator applied into wind turbines through a machine learning approach.” 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), July 2018.
     Google Scholar
  9. B. Samanta, “Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithms”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 18, issue 3, pp. 625-644, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  10. H. Henao, C. Bruzzese, E. Strangas, R. Pusca, J. Estima, M. Rieraguasp, S. H. Kia, “Trends in Fault Diagnosis for Electrical Machines: A Review of Diagnostic Techniques”, IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. Vol. 8, p.31-42, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  11. F. P. Shah, V. Patel, “A review on feature selection and feature extraction for text classification”. 2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (wispnet), p.2264-2268, mar. 2016.
     Google Scholar
  12. R. E Blahut, “Fast Algorithms for Signal Processing”. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  13. M. B. Kursa, W. R. Rudnick, “Feature Selection with the Boruta Package”. Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 36, issue 11, pp. 1-13. Set. 2010.
     Google Scholar
  14. D. Meyer, F. Leisch, K. Hornik, “The support vector machine under test”. Neurocomputing, vol. 55, issue 1-2, pp.169-186, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  15. Y. Fuqing, U. Kumar, D. Galar, “A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machine for fault diagnosis”. International Journal of Performability Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 49-60, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  16. J. J. Carbajal-Hernandez, L. P. Sanchez-Fernandez, I. Hernandez-Bautista, J. J. Medel-Juarez, L. a. Sanchez, “Classification of unbalance and misalignment in induction motors using orbital analysis and associative memories”. Neurocomputing, v. 175, p. 838-850, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  17. D. Moldovan, T. Ciora, I. Anghel, I. Salomie, “Machine learning for sensor-based manufacturing process”. 2017 13 th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), Sept. 2017.
     Google Scholar