##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In this study, asbestos-free brake lining was developed with sawdust. Sawdust was considered an alternative to asbestos, whose dust is carcinogenic. The sawdust from hard wood (mahogany and iroko trees) and other components such as abrasive, reinforcer, lubricant, were sieved into grade of 100 µm and used in production of brake linings. The percentages of sawdust for the samples are 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60. The percentages of abrasives (silicon carbides) were 27, 22, 17, 12 and 7, while binder (resins) lubricant (steel dust) and carbon black (reinforcer) were constant at 13%, 15% and 5% respectively on each sample. The molding pressure load was varied at 10 Mg, 20 Mg, 40 Mg, 60 Mg and 80 Mg during compression process. The brake lining properties examined are hardness, compressive strength and density. Also, the effects of molding pressure on these properties were evaluated. The results obtained show that the higher the molding pressure, the better the physical and mechanical properties. Furthermore, at high molding pressure, the properties reached a limiting point which they tend to be constant.  The brake linings based on sawdust were then compared with commercial (asbestos-based) brake lining and the results are in close agreement. Hence, sawdust can be effectively used as filler for replacement of asbestos in brake linings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Blau, P.J., Compositions, Functions, and Testing of Friction Brake Materials and Their Additives; TOPICAL. 2001, Oak Ridge National Lab.
     Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, D.H., Surface effects in adhesion, friction, wear, and lubrication. Vol. 5. 1981: Elsevier.
     Google Scholar
  3. Eriksson, M. and S. Jacobson, Tribological surfaces of organic brake pads. Tribology International, 2000. 33(12): p. 817-827.
     Google Scholar
  4. Chan, D. and G. Stachowiak, Review of automotive brake friction materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2004. 218(9): p. 953-966.
     Google Scholar
  5. Aigbodion, V., U. Akadike, S. Hassan, F. Asuke, and J. Agunsoye, Development of asbestos-free brake pad using bagasse. Tribology in industry, 2010. 32(1): p. 12-17.
     Google Scholar
  6. Abutu, J., S. Lawal, M. Ndaliman, and R.L. Araga, An overview of brake pad production using non–hazardous reinforcement materials. Acta Technica Corviniensis-Bulletin of Engineering, 2018. 11(3): p. 143-156.
     Google Scholar
  7. Smales, H., Friction materials—black art or science? Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1995. 209(3): p. 151-157.
     Google Scholar
  8. Yamashita, Y., M. Nakagawa, M. Ibuki, and H. Kishimoto, Friction material for making brake pads. 1993, Google Patents.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kesavan, S. and G. Burmester, Metal titanates for friction stabilization of friction materials. 1999, Google Patents.
     Google Scholar
  10. Nakagawa, M., Y. Yamashita, M. Ibuki, and H. Kishimoto, Friction material and method of manufacturing such material. 1993, Google Patents.
     Google Scholar
  11. Kimura, K., Y. Goto, N. Torii, H. Katagiri, H. Miyazawa, and Y. Motoyoshi, Friction material for dampers and process for producing the same. 1998, Google Patents.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kamioka, N., H. Tokumura, and T. Yoshino, Friction material containing BT resin dust. 1995, Google Patents.
     Google Scholar
  13. Saffar, A. and A. Shojaei, Effect of rubber component on the performance of brake friction materials, Wear, 2012. 274: p. 286-297.
     Google Scholar
  14. Handa, Y. and T. Kato, Effects of Cu powder, BaSO4 and cashew dust on the wear and friction characteristics of automotive brake pads. Tribology Transactions, 1996. 39(2): p. 346-353.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kinouchi, S., Y. Hara, and J. Yamaguchi, Friction material composition, production of the same and friction material. 2002, Google Patents.
     Google Scholar
  16. Dagwa, I. and A. Ibhadode, Design and manufacture of experimental brake pad test rig. Nigerian Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 2005. 4(3): p. 15-24.
     Google Scholar
  17. Dagwa, I. and A. Ibhadode, Determination of optimum manufacturing conditions for asbestos-free brake pad using taguchi method. 2006.
     Google Scholar
  18. Kawabe, K., T. Kawai, T. Komoto, and S.-i. Kuroda, Mechanical and Morphological Studies on compressive properties of brake materials. Sen'i Gakkaishi, 2011. 67(7): p. 153-162.
     Google Scholar
  19. Jang, H., J. Lee, and J. Fash, Compositional effects of the brake friction material on creep groan phenomena. Wear, 2001. 251(1-12): p. 1477-1483.
     Google Scholar
  20. Dellisanti, F., V. Minguzzi, and N. Morandi, Experimental results from thermal treatment of asbestos containing materials. GeoActa, 2002. 1(61): p. 2001-2002.
     Google Scholar
  21. Guo, L., H. Li, K. Li, D. Zhang, and C. Wang, Effect of the fabrication process on the properties of pitch-based carbon-carbon composites.
     Google Scholar
  22. Rothon, R., Particulate-filled polymer composites. 2003: iSmithers Rapra Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  23. Elinn, R. and P. Trojan, Engineering Materials and their application. 1992, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, USA.
     Google Scholar
  24. Nash, P., C. Wen, M. Philips, and E. Lumpkins, Advances in powder metallurgy and particulate materials, Vol. 1, No. 4, 95; 1995, Princeton, NJ, MPIF.
     Google Scholar
  25. Yusoff, Z. and S.B. Jamaludin, The influence of particle sizes and compaction pressure on surface hardness of Aluminum composite fabricated via powder metallurgy. 2011.
     Google Scholar
  26. Rao, R.U. and G. Babji, A Review paper on alternate materials for Asbestos brake pads and its characterization, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2015. 2(2): p. 556-562.
     Google Scholar