Tools for Risk Management of Technical Facilities Operation



Abstract Views
446

Downloads
313

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Mar 21, 2020
Published Apr 25, 2020
10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.4.1854

Abstract viewed = 446 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The article shows the results of research directed to detection of technical facilities accidents and failures sources at their operation. The research aim is to create the effective tools for management of risks so the coexistence of technical facilities with their vicinity would be ensured throughout their life cycles. The problems solution way is based on the simultaneously preferred concept, in which the safety is preferred over the reliability.  Respecting the present knowledge on technical facilities´ safety and the lessons learned from the past technical facilities accidents and  failures, the causes of which were connected with their operation, two tools are developed:  Decision Support System and Risk Management Plan that were reviewed by experts and tested in practice.

Keywords: Decision Support System Operation Risk Risk Management Plan Safety Technical Facility

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. B. Ale, I. Papazoglou and E. Zi, “Reliability, Risk and Safety”. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2010, 2448p.
     Google Scholar
  2. M. Beer, M. and E. Zi, “Proceedings of the 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference”. Singapore: ESRA, 2019, e:enquiries@ rpsonline.com.sg
     Google Scholar
  3. C. Bérenguer, A. Grall and C. Guedes Soares, “Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management”. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2011, 3035p.
     Google Scholar
  4. R. Briš, C. Guedes Soares and S. Martorell, “Reliability, Risk and Safety. Theory and Applications”. London: CRC Press, 2009, 2362p.
     Google Scholar
  5. M. Cepin, and R. Bris, “Safety and Reliability – Theory and Applications”. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2017, 3627p.
     Google Scholar
  6. S. Haugen, J. Vinnem, A. Barros, T. Kongsvik and A. Van Gulijk, “Safe Societies in a Changing World”. London: Taylor & Francis, 2018, Group 3234p.; https://www.ntnu.edu/ esrel2018.
     Google Scholar
  7. IAPSAM, “Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference”. Helsinki: IPSAM  ESRA, 2012, 6889p.
     Google Scholar
  8. T. Nowakowski, M. Mlyňczak, A. Jodejko-Pietruczuk and S. Werbiňska-Wojciechowska, “Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Application”. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014, 2453p.
     Google Scholar
  9. L. Podofillini, B. Sudret, B. Stojadinovic, E. Zio and W. Kröger, “Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered systems: ESREL 2015”. London: CRC press, 2015, 4560p.
     Google Scholar
  10. [R. Steenbergen, P. Van Gelder, S. Miraglia and A. Ton Vrouwenvelder, “Safety Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon”. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2013, 3387p.
     Google Scholar
  11. L. Walls, l., M. Revie and T. Bedford, “Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016. London: CRC Press, 2016, 2942p.
     Google Scholar
  12. D. Prochazkova, “Analysis and Coping with Risks Connected with Technical Facilities”. Praha: ČVUT, 2018, 222p. http://hdl.handle.net /10467/78442
     Google Scholar
  13. D. Prochazkova, “Safety of Complex Technological Facilities”. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015, 232p.
     Google Scholar
  14. D. Prochazkova, “Principles of Management of Risks of Complex Technological Facilities”. Praha: ČVUT, 2017, 364p., http://hdl.handle. net/10467/72582
     Google Scholar
  15. FEMA, “Guide for All-Hazard Emergency Operations Planning”. State and Local Guide (SLG) 101. Washington: FEMA, 1996.
     Google Scholar
  16. OECD, “Machine-to-Machine Communications: Connecting Billions of Devices”. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 192. Paris: OECD, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9 gsh2gp043-en
     Google Scholar
  17. C. Perrow, “Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies”. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  18. D. Prochazkova, D., J. Prochazka, J. Lukavsky, V. Dostal, Z. Prochazka and L. Ouhrabka. “Management of Risks Connected with Technical Facility Operation”. http://hdl.handle.net/10467/85867. doi:10.14 31/BK.97 88001066751
     Google Scholar
  19. S. Sagan, “The Limits of Safety”. Princeton: Princeton University 1993.
     Google Scholar
  20. CVUT, “Database on World Disasters, Technical Entities Accidents and Failures – Causes, Impacts and Lessons Learned”. Praha: CVUT, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  21. D. Prochazkova, “Methods, Tools and Techniques for Risk Engineering”. Praha: ČVUT, 2011, 369p.
     Google Scholar
  22. J. Dedina, “Management and Organizational Behaviour”. Praha: Grada, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  23. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, “Decision with Multiple Objectives”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993, 569p.
     Google Scholar
  24. D. Prochazkova, J. Prochazka, J. Riha, V. Beran and Z. Prochazka, “DSS for Ensuring the Coexistence of Technical Facility with Its Vicinity during the Type Selection and Sitting” In: Proceedings of the 29th European Safety and Reliability Conference. Singapore: ESRA, 2019, e:enquiries@rpsonline.com.sg
     Google Scholar
  25. D. Prochazkova, “Critical Infrastructure Safety Management Rules”. Praha: CVUT, 2013, 223p.
     Google Scholar
  26. M. Zairi, “Total Quality Management for Engineers”. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 1991.
     Google Scholar