Numerical Analysis of Adhesive Joints with Bi-Layered Adherends



Abstract Views
745

Downloads
401

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 30, 2020
Published Jun 28, 2020
10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.6.1959

Abstract viewed = 745 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Improvement of joint quality has always being a call for concern in an assembled component due to numerous application of such components in immense industrial sectors such as aerospace and automotive industries, electrical/electronic industries etc. With this in mind quite a vast research had been carried out and still on going to enhance the characteristics of various parts that makes up an assemble and the complete assemble itself. Part of the research carried out fixated on adhesive bonded joint of different geometrical designs such as L-shape, single-lap, double-lap, tubular, T-shaped, stepped and scarf joints etc. Focusing on single –lap joint due to the simplicity of the design geometry and their ease of fabrication, various forms of arrangement have been researched on. But owing to its untimely failure, caused by high strength concentration in the overlapping areas and some other parts that are delicate to peel damage various forms of design geometry have been adopted ranging from tapering, stepping and wavy lapping of overlapping layers in order to reduce or mitigate the stress concentration for an improved load bearing ability. Due to a lot of challenges being faced with difficulty in fabrication, this study focused on double layer single-lap joint. Its harmonic response when subjected to external dynamic loading was investigated with the use of Ansys finite element analysis. The numerical analysis was carried out on various forms of adhesive-adherends arrangement, and from the harmonic response obtained it showed that the double layer single-lap joint have improved load bearing capacity as compared with other geometrical designs.

Keywords: Adherends Ansys Finite Element Modelling (FEM) Double Adhesive Single Lap Joint Harmonic Response

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering, Springer 1997.
     Google Scholar
  2. R. Garcia, P. Prabhakar, Bond interface design for single lap joints using polymeric additive manufacturing, Composite Structures 176 (2017) 547–555.
     Google Scholar
  3. Rachad Hazimeh, Khaled Khalil, Georges Challita, Ramzi Othman, Analytical model of double-lap bonded joints subjected to impact loads, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 57 (2015) 1-8.
     Google Scholar
  4. H. Khalid Almitani, Ramzi Othman, Analytical solution of the harmonic response of visco- elastic adhesively bonded single-lap and double-lap joints, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 71 (2016) 55–65.
     Google Scholar
  5. E. Armentania, M. Laiso, F. Caputo, R. Sepe, Numerical FEM Evaluation for the Structural Behaviour of a Hybrid (bonded/bolted) Single-lap Composite Joint, AIAS 2017 International Conference on Stress Analysis, AIAS 2017, Pisa, Italy, 6-9 September 2017.
     Google Scholar
  6. S. Webb, P. Shin, K. Peters, M.A. Zikry, N. Stan, S. Chadderdon, R. Selfridge, S. Schultz, Characterization of fatigue damage in adhesively bonded lap joints through dynamic, full-spectral interrogation of fiber Bragg grating sensors, 1. Experiments. Smart Material Structure 23 (2014) 025-016.
     Google Scholar
  7. S. Webb, P. Shin, K. Peters, M.A. Zikry, N. Stan, S. Chadderdon, R. Selfridge, S. Schultz, Characterization of fatigue damage in adhesively bonded lap joints through dynamic, full-spectral interrogation of fiber Bragg grating sensors, 2. Simulations. Smart Material Structure 23 (2014) 025-016.
     Google Scholar
  8. Challita G, Othman R. Analytical model of the double-lap bonded joints response to harmonic loads. European Journal of Mechanics – A/Solids 34 (2012) 149–58.
     Google Scholar
  9. Z. G. Apalak, R. Ekici, M. Yildirim, M. K. Apalak, Free vibration analysis of an adhesively bonded functionally graded double containment cantilever joint. Journal of Adhesive Science and Technology 28 (2014) 1117–39.
     Google Scholar
  10. R. Hazimeh, R. Othman, K. Khalil, G. Challita, Influence of plies’ orientations on the stress distribution in adhesively bonded laminate composite joints subjected to impact loadings, Composite Structures 15 (2016) 2 654–64.
     Google Scholar
  11. R. Hazimeh, G. Challita, K. Khalil, R. Othman, Finite element analysis of adhesively bonded composite joints subjected to impact loadings, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 56 (2015) 24–31.
     Google Scholar
  12. M. May, O. Hesebeck, S. Marzi, W. Böhme, J. Lienhard, S. Kilchert, M. Brede, S. Hiermaier, Rate dependent behavior of crash-optimized adhesives -experimental characterization, model development, and simulation, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 133 (2015) 112–37.
     Google Scholar
  13. G. Challita, R. Othman, P. Casari, K. Khalil, Experimental investigation of the shear dynamic behavior of double-lap adhesively bonded joints on a wide range of strain rates, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 31 (2011) 146–53.
     Google Scholar
  14. J. García-Barruetabeña, F. Cortés, Experimental analysis of the vibrational response of an adhesively bonded beam, Measurement 55 (2014) 238–45.
     Google Scholar
  15. Y. Du, L. Shi, Effect of vibration fatigue on model properties of single lap adhesive joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 53 (2014)72–9.
     Google Scholar
  16. O. Volkersen, Die Niektraftverteilung in Zugbeanspruchten mit Konstanten Laschenquerschritten. Luftfahrtforschung 15 (1938) (1–2) 41–7.
     Google Scholar
  17. M. Goland, E. Reissner, The stresses in cemented joints. Journal of Applied Mechanics 11 (1944) 17–27.
     Google Scholar
  18. L. J. Hart-Smith, Adhesive-bonded double-lap joints. NASA Langley Report CR (1973)112235.
     Google Scholar
  19. L. J. Hart-Smith, Adhesive-bonded single-lap joints. NASA Langley Report CR (1973) 112236
     Google Scholar
  20. L.J. Hart-Smith, Adhesive-bonded scarf and stepped-lap joints. NASA Langley Report CR (1973) 112237.
     Google Scholar
  21. F. Delale, F. Erdogan, M. N. Aydinoglu, Stresses in adhesively bonded joints: A closed form solution. Journal of Composite Materials 15 (1981) 249-271.
     Google Scholar
  22. G. P. Zou, K. Shahin, F. Taheri, An analytical solution for the analysis of symmetric composite adhesively bonded joints. Composite Structures 65 (2004) 499-510.
     Google Scholar
  23. H. Osnes, D. McGeorge, Analysis of overlaminated double-lap joints, Composites B 36 (2005) 544-558.
     Google Scholar
  24. H. Osnes, D. McGeorge, Experimental and analytical strength analysis of double-lap joints for marine applications, Composites B 40 (2009) 29-40.
     Google Scholar
  25. A. G. Magalhaes, M. F. S. F. De Moura, J. P. M. Goncalves, Evaluation of stress concentration effects in single-lap bonded joints of laminate composite materials, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 25 (2005) 313–9.
     Google Scholar
  26. K. Kim, Y. Yi, G. Cho, C. Kim, Failure orediction and strength improvement of unidirectional composite single lap bonded joints, Composite Structures 82 (2008) 513–20.
     Google Scholar
  27. R. D. S. G. Campilho, M. D. Banea, J. A. B. P. Neto, L. F. M. Da Silva, Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: Effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 44 (2013) 48–56.
     Google Scholar
  28. J. A. B. P. Neto, R. D. S. G. Campilho, L. F. M. Da Silva, Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 37 (2012) 96–101.
     Google Scholar
  29. F. Benyahia, A. Albedah, B. Bachir Bouiadjra, Analysis of the adhesive damage for different patch shapes in bonded composite repair of aircraft structures, Material Design 54 (2014) 18–24.
     Google Scholar
  30. L. M. Fernández-Cañadas, I. Iváñez, S. Sanchez-Saez, Influence of the cohesive law shape on the composite adhesively bonded patch repair behaviour, Composite B-Engineering 91 (2016) 414–21.
     Google Scholar
  31. S. M. Fekih, A. Albedah, F. Benyahia, M. Belhouari, B. Bachir Bouiadjra, A. Miloudi, Optimisation of the sizes of bonded composite repair in aircraft structures. Material Design 41 (2012) 171–6.
     Google Scholar
  32. J. De Castro, T. Keller, Ductile double-lap joints from brittle GFRP laminates and ductile adhesives, Part II: numerical investigation and joint strength prediction, Composites: Part B 39 (2008) 282–91.
     Google Scholar
  33. R. D. S. G. Campilho, M. D. Banea, J. A. B. P. Neto, L. F. M. Da Silva, Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations. Journal of Adhesives 88 (2012) 513–33.
     Google Scholar
  34. S. M. R. Khalili, S. Khalili, M. R. Pirouzhashemi, A. Shokuhfar, R. K. Mittal, Numerical study of lap joints with composite adhesives and composite adherends subjected to in-plane and transverse loads. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 28 (2008) (8) 411–8.
     Google Scholar
  35. W. Jialai, E. G. William, Theoretical model of adhesively bonded single lap joints with functionally graded adherends, Engineering Structures 124 (2016) 316–332
     Google Scholar
  36. M. Mustapha, B. Samir, T. Abdelouahed, E. A. A. Bedia, M. Slimane, Interfacial stresses in plated beams with exponentially-varying properties, Journal of Adhesive Sciece & Technology 24 (2010) 1063–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/016942409X12584625925024
     Google Scholar
  37. A. A. Iclal, G. Kürsat, A. Salih, A. Hamit, O. Adnan, Experimental analysis on the single-lap joints bonded by nanocomposite adhesives which obtained by adding nanostructures, Composites Part B 110 (2017) 420-428.
     Google Scholar