Comparative Effectiveness of Flotation Technique at Varying Conditions for Beneficiation of Itakpe and Agbaja Iron Ores

  • Serah Akande 
  • Oladunni O. Alabi 
  • E. O. Ajaka 
  • Temitope Amos Olatunji 


Abstract Views
531

Downloads
357

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jun 5, 2020
Published Jun 16, 2020
10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.6.1984

Abstract viewed = 531 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Itakpe and Agbaja iron ores are part of prominent iron deposits in Nigeria, yet studies on their beneficiation via froth flotation are relatively limited. Thus, this research investigated comparatively the flotation behaviour of both ores at varied pulp pH, particle size, and collector type. The ores were also examined using Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Petrological, and fractional sieve size analyses. Fifty (50) kg sample each of the ores was sourced for the research. Then, size fractions (63, 75, and 125 mm) of each ore were prepared and subjected to froth flotation using different collectors; Potassium Amyl Xanthate (PAX), Sodium Ethyl Xanthate (SEX), and Oleic Acid, at varying pulp pH ranging from 9-11. From the results obtained Itakpe iron ore assayed 36.18% Fe2O3 and contains predominantly haematite, sillimanite, and quartz while Agbaja iron ore contains chiefly, quartz and haematite, and assayed 40.6% Fe2O3 alongside 1.505% P2O5. The liberation sizes of both ores lie favouraby in the range -125+75 µm. Beneficiation studies carried out revealed that significant enrichment of both ores was actualized. Thus, it was established that Itakpe iron ore is best processed using PAX at pH 11 and particle size of 125 µm yielding concentrates assaying 67.66% Fe2O3 at a recovery of ~90% while for Agbaja iron ore, PAX at pH 9 and particle size of 63 µm is considered best to yield enriched concentrates assaying 65.5% Fe2O3 at 52.5%.recovery.

Keywords: Agbaja and Itakpe Iron Ores Comparative Effectiveness Froth Flotation Process Parameters

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. . E. O. Akinrinsola, and J. I. Adekeye, “A geostatistical ore reserve estimation of the Itakpe iron ore deposit Okene, Kogi State,” J. Min. Geol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 19-25, 1993.
     Google Scholar
  2. . A. S. AbdulRahman, “Susceptibility of Agbaja iron ore deposit in North Central Nigeria to magnetic separation,” Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 87-95, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  3. . O. O. Alabi, “Beneficiation of Ajabanoko iron ore deposit Kogi State, Nigeria using magnetic separation,” International Journal of Civil, Mechanical and Energy Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91-93, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  4. . NIOMCo Project Report, vol. 2, pp. 1-10, 1980.
     Google Scholar
  5. . Raw Materials Research and Development Council (RMRDC), “Raw Materials update,” A Bi-Annual Publication of the Raw Materials Research and Development Council, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9., 2005.
     Google Scholar
  6. . A. C. Araujo, P. R. M. Viana, and A. E. C. Peres, “Reagents in iron ores flotation,” Mineral Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 219–224, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  7. . B. A. Wills, and T. J. Napier-Munn, Mineral Processing Technology, 7th ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2006, ch. 12, 267-274.
     Google Scholar
  8. . N. Fardis, and I. Medhi, “Reagents types in flotation of iron oxide minerals: A review,” Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 89-124, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  9. . P. Olubambi, and J. Potgieter, “Effectiveness of gravity concentration for the beneficiation of Itakpe (Nigeria) iron ore achieved through jigging operation,” Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 21-30, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  10. . S. A. Ola et al., “Pilot-scale froth flotation studies to upgrade Nigerian Itakpe sinter grade iron ore to Mixres-grade super-concentrate,” Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 405-416. 2009.
     Google Scholar
  11. . J. K. Odusote., A. A. Adeleke, S. A. Bankole, and A. A. Adeolu, “Preliminary characterisation of iron ores for steel making processes,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 35, pp. 1123-1128, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  12. . P. L. Neymayer, E. S. George, and E. K. Antônio, “Effect of particle size range on iron ore flotation,” REM: R. Esc. Minas, Ouro Preto, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 251-256, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  13. . M. Patricia, I. Jose, G. Cesar, and P. Oscar, “Assessing data analysis performance in research contexts: An experiment on accuracy, efficiency, productivity, and researchers’ satisfaction,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 116, pp. 177-204, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  14. . R. K. Richard, “Froth flotation,” Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Third Edition), pp. 219-234, 2003.
     Google Scholar