##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In this paper, we present augmented reality applications implemented by students and teachers of the 5th Vocational High School of Heraklion in Crete, within the context of informatics courses. The applications aim to enhance the traveling experience of the visitors of Heraklion city, exploiting the global spread of smart mobile devices in contemporary societies and the facilities they provide. The whole project was accomplished in a collaborative manner and focused on the provision of information about museums and monuments of Heraklion city. The applications have to be installed on the smart mobile device of the user.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. J. Billieux, P. Maurage, O. Lopez-Fernandez, D. J. Kuss, and M. D. Griffiths, “Can Disordered Mobile Phone Use Be Considered a Behavioral Addiction? An Update on Current Evidence and a Comprehensive Model for Future Research,” Curr. Addict. Reports, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 156–162, Jun. 2015.
     Google Scholar
  2. C. L. Ventola, “Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits,” Pharm. Ther., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 356–364, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  3. H. Verkasalo, C. López-Nicolás, F. J. Molina-Castillo, and H. Bouwman, “Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 242–255, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  4. H. Kennedy-Eden and U. Gretzel, “A taxonomy of mobile applications in tourism,” 2012.
     Google Scholar
  5. D. Wang, S. Park, and D. Fesenmaier, “An examination of information services and smartphone applications,” 2011.
     Google Scholar
  6. D. Fonseca, N. Martí, E. Redondo, I. Navarro, and A. Sánchez, “Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 31, pp. 434–445, Feb. 2014.
     Google Scholar
  7. D. Van Krevelen and R. P. Amsterdam, “Augmented reality: Technologies, applications, and limitations,” Vrije Univ. Amsterdam, Dep. Comput. Sci., 2007.
     Google Scholar
  8. H.-L. Chi, “Research trends and opportunities of augmented reality applications in architecture, engineering, and construction,” Autom. Constr., vol. 33, pp. 116–122, Aug. 2013.
     Google Scholar
  9. R. T. Azuma, “A Survey of Augmented Reality,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, Aug. 1997.
     Google Scholar
  10. M. Bower, C. Howe, N. McCredie, A. Robinson, and D. Grover, “Augmented Reality in education – cases, places and potentials,” EMI. Educ. Media Int., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2014.
     Google Scholar
  11. M. Billinghurst, H. Kato, and I. P. Graphics, “The magicbook-moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality,” iEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 6–8, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  12. S. Johnson, L.; Levine, A.; Smith, R.; Stone, The horizon report. 2010.
     Google Scholar
  13. N. Ruparelia, “Software development lifecycle models,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 8–13, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  14. C. Ullrich, K. Borau, H. Luo, X. Tan, and … L. S., “Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: principles and prototypes,” in In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web . ACM., 2008, pp. 705–714.
     Google Scholar
  15. M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004.
     Google Scholar