##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper analyses the discovery learning / constuctivistic approach using cognitive tools in higher Mathematics education and focuses on electronic worksheets designed and implemented in Mathematica. The approach was applied at the University of Piraeus. Students from the Department of Statistics and Insurance Sciences participated in the research. The paper focuses on empirical research results on students’ attitudes towards the approach, concerning the cognitive tool used (Mathematica), the approach’s discovery learning and constructivistic characteristics and the development of higher order thinking skills supported by the approach. Regarding factors that could influence students’ attitudes, gender and experience in using computers are investigated. This paper uses quantitative methods in analyzing data collected via the use of a questionnaire and the research approaches used are the descriptive / investigative and the correlational approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Korres, K. (2007). A Teaching Approach of Science and Mathematics courses using new technologies (in Greek). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Piraeus, Department of Statistics and Insurance Sciences.
     Google Scholar
  2. Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2013). Computers as cognitive tools. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  3. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking (2nd Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  4. Brierton, S., Wilson, E., Kistler, M., Flowers, J. & Jones, D. (2016). “A comparison of higher order thinking skills demonstrated in synchronous and asynchronous online college discussion posts”. NACTA Journal, 60 (1), 14.
     Google Scholar
  5. Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). “What affects learner's higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors”. Computers & Education, 115, 143–152.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. (1960). “On Learning Mathematics”. The Mathematics Teacher, 53, 610–619.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
     Google Scholar
  8. Steffe, L., Cobb, P. & Von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meaning and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
     Google Scholar
  9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, K. (1996). "Vygotskian approaches to human development in the information era". Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 43–62.
     Google Scholar
  11. Knowles, M. (1984). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species (3rd Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  12. Learning and Skills Research Center – LSRC (2004). Thinking Skills Framework for post–16 learners: an evaluation. A research report for the Learning and Skills Research Center.
     Google Scholar
  13. Iowa Department of Education (1989). A guide to developing higher order thinking across the curriculum. Des Moines, Iowa: Iowa Department of Education.
     Google Scholar
  14. Korres, K., Psycharis, S. & Makri-Botsari, E. (2011). “Scaffolding in Mathematics and Science Higher Education”. Proceedings of the 2011 Open Classroom Conference of the European Distance and E-Learning Network (EDEN). Ellinogermaniki Agogi, Athens, 27–29 October 2011.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kyriazis, A., Psycharis, S. & Korres, K. (2009). “Discovery Learning and the Computational Experiment in Higher Mathematics and Science Education: A combined approach”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 4 (4), 25–34.
     Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.
     Google Scholar