Research Article

Towards Sustainable Composite Building Material: Integrating Lime with Slag for reduced mortar Thermal Conductivity

Sule Adeniyi Olaniyan
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.4.855

Read Counter
785

Downloads
386

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2018-08-05
Published 2020-04-25

Read counter = 785 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Lime Based Mortar became very popular due to its outstanding features of flexibility, permeability and low carbon emissions. However, lime’s characteristic delayed setting, late hardening time, low mechanical strength, among others, overshadowed significance of its outstanding features, thereby putting its overall use into decline, particularly, with the 19th century Portland Cement discovery. This study therefore aims at reviving lime usage through a sustainable lime composite, by integrating an industrial by-product, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (slag) with lime, in form of lime-slag mortar, with a view to reducing the mortar thermal conductivity. The methodology involved mortars with the same Binder/Aggregate (B/A) mix ratio (1:3) using five separate volumetric compositions of ‘slag-lime’ binders (i.e. 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:1 and 3:1). Physical properties of the mortars involving their Water/Binder (W/B) ratios, Air Contents and Bulk Densities were recorded. Comparative evaluations of the compositions in hardened state, involving thermal conductivities were carried out at specific intervals through a twelve-month curing period. These were partly monitored through assessments of the composites’ microstructural behaviours over a six-month period. Results of the investigation show that addition of slag to mortars facilitate slightly larger pores with increased porosities. However, these effects are minimal (i.e. from 23.42% to 25.37% porosity) when slag content is at equal volumetric content with lime. A general reduction (not in a linear trend) in the thermal conductivities of the mortar with increasing slag content was observed, cumulating in 25% decrease in the composites having thrice volumetric content of slag, relative to lime. Composite’s reduced thermal conductivity would be of utmost importance in construction especially, where material’s limited thermal conductivity property is of utmost importance.

Keywords: Carbon emissions Climate Change E-value Flexibility Lime Mortars Thermal Conductivity

References

  1. D. Ciancio, C. T. S. Beckett, and J. A. H. Carraro, “Optimum lime content identification for lime-stabilised rammed earth,” Construction and Building Materials, 53, pp. 59-65, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  2. S. A. Olaniyan, “Sustainable Lime Based Mortars: Performance Assessment of Composites for Building Construction,” PhD Thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  3. A. Hussain, and K. Kamal, “Energy Efficient Sustainable Building Materials: An Overview,” Key Engineering Materials, 650, pp. 38–50, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  4. D. M. Roodman, and N. Lenssen, “A Building Revolution: How Ecology and Health Concerns are Transforming Construction,” Worldwatch Paper 124, Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C., 1995, p. 5.
     Google Scholar
  5. De Lieto Vollaro Roberto, M. Calvesi, G. Battista, L. Evangelisti, P. Gori, and C. Guattari, “A new method of technical analysis to optimise the design of low impact energy systems for buildings,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 3(4), pp. 241-250, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  6. N. Fumo, “A review on the basics of building energy estimation,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, pp. 53-60, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  7. S. A. Olaniyan, and A.J. Klemm, “Current trends in development of lime based composites,” Building Physics in Theory and Practice, VII (3), pp. 49-54, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  8. V. S. K. V. Harish, and A. Kumar, “A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, pp. 1272-1292, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  9. A. J. Klemm, and K. S. Sikora, “The effect of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) on microstructure and mechanical properties of fly ash cementitious mortars”, Construction and Building Materials, 49, pp. 134-143, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  10. D. B. Goldstein, and C. Eley, “A classification of building energy performance indices”, Energy Efficiency, 7(2), pp. 353-375, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  11. S. Yaguang, (July 2018) “Research on New Technology of Energy Efficient Buildings and Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources” in Green Building Technologies and Materials - 19.2 New Trend of Energy Efficiency Technology, Wu Xie, Ed. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Available: https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt009EW6J1/green-building-technologies/new-trend-energy-efficiency
     Google Scholar
  12. J. Lanas, J. L. Pérez Bernal, M. A. Bello, and J. I. Alvarez Galindo, “Mechanical properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, 34(12), 2191–2201, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  13. M. Arandigoyen, and J. I. Alvarez, “Pore structure and mechanical properties of cement–lime mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, 37(5), 767-775, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  14. J. Hughes, J. E. Lindqvist, CBI Betonginstitutet AB, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut, and RISE RILEM TC 203-RHM, “Repair mortars for historic masonry: The role of mortar in masonry: An introduction to requirements for the design of repair mortars,” Materials and Structures, 45(9), 1287-1294, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  15. P. F. G. Banfill, “Rheological methods for assessing the flow properties of mortar and related materials,” Construction and Building Materials, 8(1), 43-50, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  16. L. Mcdonald, “Hydraulic lime mortar for the house of the future,” The Structural Engineer, 78 (7), 2000.
     Google Scholar
  17. A. M. Forster, “An assessment of the relationship between the water vapour permeability and hydraulicity of lime based mortars with particular reference to building conservation materials science,” PhD Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  18. A. Solak, “Experimental investigation of lime mortar used in historical buildings in becin, turkey,” Materials Science, 22(1), 105-112, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  19. Edwards A.J. (2005) Properties of Hydraulic and Non-Hydraulic Limes for Use in Construction. PhD Thesis, Napier University, Edinburgh.
     Google Scholar
  20. R. J. Ball, A. El-Turki, W. J. Allen, J. A. Nicholson, and G. C. Allen, “Deformation of NHL3.5 and CL90/PC hybrid mortars. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers” Construction Materials, 162(1), 29-35, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  21. J. J. Hughes, and J. Valek, “Mortars in Historic Buildings: A Review of the Conservation, Technical and Scientific Literature,” Historic Scotland, & Historic Scotland, Technical Conservation, Research and Education Division. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  22. S. A. Olaniyan, A. J. Klemm, and F. C. Almeida, “Evolving Low Carbon Sustainable Building Material: Making Case for Cement-Lime Composites,” 9th International Concrete Conference on Environment, Efficiency and Economic Challenges for Concrete, Dundee, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  23. F. Pacheco-Torgal, J. Castro-Gomes, and S. Jalali, “Alkali-Activated Binders: A review: Part 1. Historical Background, Terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products,” Construction and Building Materials, 22(7), 1305, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  24. A. Izaguirre, J. Lanas, and J. I. Alvarez, “Effect of a polypropylene fibre on the behaviour of aerial lime-based mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, 25(2), 992-1000, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  25. A. M. Forster, and K. Carter, “A framework for specifying natural hydraulic lime mortars for masonry construction,” Structural Survey, 29(5), 373-396, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  26. L. Ventola, M. Vendrell, and P. Giraldez, “Newly-designed traditional lime mortar with a phase change material as an additive,” Construction and Building Materials, 47, 1210-1216, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  27. B. Das, S. Prakash, P. S. R. Reddy, and V. N. Misra, “An overview of utilization of slag and sludge from steel industries,” Resources Conservation and Recycling, 50, 40–57, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  28. M. Chi, Y. Liu, and R. Huang, “Mechanical and microstructural characterization of alkali-activated materials based on fly ash and slag,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 59-64, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  29. W. Chen, and H. J. Brouwers, “The hydration of slag, part 1: reaction models for alkali-activated slag,” Journal of Materials Science, 42(2), 428-443, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  30. M. B. Haha, B. Lothenbach, G. Le Saout, and F. Winnefeld, “Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag — part I: Effect of MgO,” Cement and Concrete Research, 41(9), 955-963, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  31. Q. Wang, P. Yan, and S. Han, “The influence of steel slag on the hydration of cement during the hydration process of complex binder,” Science China Technological Sciences, 54(2), 388-394, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  32. J. L. Provis, R. J. Myers, C. E. White, V. Rose, and J. S. J. Van Deventer, “X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders,” Cement and Concrete Research, 42(6), 855-864, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  33. Z. Tan, G. De Schutter, G. Ye, Y. Gao, and L. Machiels, “Influence of particle size on the early hydration of slag particle activated by ca solution,” Construction and Building Materials, 52, 488, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  34. J. I. Escalantea, L. Y. Gomez, K. K. Johalb, G. Mendozaa, H. Manchaa, and J. Mendez, “Reactivity of Blast-Furnace Slag in Portland Cement Blends Hydrated Under Different Conditions,” Cement and Concrete Research 31, 1403–1409, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  35. A. M. Rashad, and M. H. Khalil, “A preliminary study of alkali-activated slag blended with silica fume under the effect of thermal loads and thermal shock cycles,” Construction and Building Materials, 40, 522-532, 2013;
     Google Scholar
  36. J. V. Dubrawski, “Thermal Characteristics of Aged Granulated Blast Furnace Slags,” Journal of Thermal Analysis, 48, 63-72, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  37. [37] S. Aydın, and B. Baradan, “Effect of activator type and content on properties of alkali-activated slag mortars,” Composites Part B: Engineering, 57, 166-172, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  38. X. Wu, D. M. Roy, and C. A. Langton, “Early stage hydration of slag-cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, 13, 277-286, 1983.
     Google Scholar
  39. C. Shi, and J. Qian, “High performance cementing materials from industrial slags — a review,” Resources Conservation and Recycling, 29(3), 195-207, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  40. R. E. Nicolas, and J. L. Provis, “The interfacial transition zone in alkali-activated slag mortars,” Frontiers in Materials, 2, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  41. H. Ye, and A. Radlińska, “Shrinkage mechanisms of alkali-activated slag,” Cement and Concrete Research, 88, 126-135, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  42. J. Lanas, J. L. Pérez Bernal, M. A. Bello, and J. I. Alvarez Galindo, “Mechanical properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, 34(12), 2191–2201, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  43. Y. Sébaı̈bi, R. M. Dheilly, and M. Quéneudec, “A study of the viscosity of lime–cement paste: Influence of the physico-chemical characteristics of lime,” Construction and Building Materials, 18(9), 653-660, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  44. M. M. Hossain, M. R. Karim, M. K. Hossain, M. N. Islam, and M. F. M. Zain, “Durability of mortar and concrete containing alkali-activated binder with pozzolans: A review,” Construction and Building Materials, 93, 95-109, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  45. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2000) BS EN 1015: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table).
     Google Scholar
  46. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2010a) BS EN 998: Masonry Mortar – Part 2: Specification for Mortar for Masonry.
     Google Scholar
  47. A. Moropoulou, “Reverse engineering: a proper methodology for compatible restoration mortars” RILEM Conference Proceedings on Historic Mortars, Delft, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  48. A. Moropoulou, A. S. Cakmak, G. Biscontin, A. Bakolas, and E. Zendri, “Advanced byzantine cement based composites resisting earthquake stresses: The crushed brick/lime mortars of Justinian's Hagia Sophia,” Construction and Building Materials, 16(8), 543-552, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  49. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2013) BS EN 13139: Aggregates for mortar - Part 3 (PD 6682): Guidance on the use of BS EN 13139.
     Google Scholar
  50. ASTM C136 (2014) Standard Test Method for Particle Size Distributions.
     Google Scholar
  51. ASTM C 33 (ASTM, 2016) Standard Specification for mortar Aggregates
     Google Scholar
  52. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2010b). BS EN 459: Building Lime – Part 2: Test Method.
     Google Scholar
  53. J. Lanas, and J. I. Alvarez-Galindo, “Masonry repair lime-based mortars: Factors affecting the mechanical behaviour” Cement and Concrete Research, 33(11), 1867-1876, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  54. M. J. Mosquera, B. Silva, B.Prieto, and E. Ruiz-Herrera, “Addition of cement to lime-based mortars: effect on pore structure and vapor transport,” Cement and Concrete Research 36, 1635– 1642, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  55. R. Hanley, and S. Pavía, “A study of the workability of natural hydraulic lime mortars and its influence on strength,” Materials and Structures, 41(2), 373-381, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  56. ASTM C518 (2015) Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Philadelphia.
     Google Scholar
  57. British Standards Institution (BSI, 1999a). Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table).
     Google Scholar
  58. British Standards Institution (BSI) (1999b) BS EN 1015: Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry – Part 7: Determination of Air content of Fresh Mortar.
     Google Scholar
  59. M. Chi, and R. Huang, “Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, 40, 291-298, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  60. H. Geng, and Q. Li, “Development of microstructure and chemical composition of hydration products of slag activated by ordinary portland cement,” Materials Characterization, 87, 149, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  61. S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, V. Rose, R. Mej´ıa de Guti´errez, “High-resolution X-ray diffraction and fluorescence microscopy characterization of alkali-activated slag-metakaolin binders. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 96, 1951–57, 2013.
     Google Scholar